Screen Shot 2024-03-06 at 7.03.20 AM

Yesterday I spoke about there not being a Guru of Krishna, at least not in the sense of being well known

Or being a presence. 

We are supposed to be like the king that krishna is. 

And today a video that I had been overlooking – brought Saandipani to me. 

Among several pieces of media that I had to oversee. 

Basically I was teaching that a Guru is not for everyone. A guru is for those that are ineligible for the devotee / deity coupling. 

Therefore I am not going to google if EVER there was a guru for Hanuman. 

Because even if there was a name that was injected at some point of time, they will only be a distraction for Hanuman – and for all purposes they are useless because even I dont know them – there was none!  Hanuman has no time and energy for distractions of any kind.  He is okay with being vismrit – in forgetfulness and melancholy in separation.  But Hanuman knows His Lord has no time for an intermediary either – He is always approachable.  That is the concept of Bhakti. 

Therefore we can say there is NO use for a Guru for someone that is in the Bhakti tradition – anything other than your Deity is to distract you. 

I will explain more with the oozzoo theory on my Ashram blog.

rammandir1

Kah kahun chhabi aaju ki

bhale bano ho naath

maharaj man tb lage

hridya peed ho nash,

phal milein to unhein bhi

jinki maujein rokin nhi

Kah kahun chhabi aaju ki

bhale bane ho naath

aisa lagta hai ravan ke

duniya bhar se

rachas pakad laye ho saath

panhaiya tut jye …

ayodhya agamya ho jye

phir kya aise bhakt priya hain aapko ?

to hum bhi aayeinge

sab(kakeki) tod tad ke

phuti hai is desh ki kismat ki jo

jaante hain sab

karne wale hain sab cheezon ke

woh puja karne nikle hain

aap bhakta vatsal hain

par baali ki vida ki taiyari kijiye, Shri Ram

usse pehle Sugrive ko chuniye

JAI SHRI RAM – JAI JAI SHRI RAM